Posted tagged ‘exemption’

Weekly SALT News Update

October 18, 2011

State DOR Letters and Administrative Rulings

Illinois Office of Administrative Hearings respects the entity, and rules Department of Revenue cannot go after owner of corporation for use tax liability on vessel use in Illinois. Use tax is not a trust tax. It also rules that the foreign corporate owner of a vessel used in Illinois for 30 days/year has sufficient nexus to allow Illinois to impose use tax on value of vessel. Taxpayer allowed credit for tax paid outside the state. Correct tax base for assessment of use tax is the purchase price reduced by depreciation prior to first use in Illinois.

Virginia Tax Commissioner rules that a taxpayer cannot include a foreign corporation that did not have nexus with Virginia into its combined Virginia corporate income tax return. Further, the taxpayer failed to follow proper procedure to claim a valid business purpose to exclude factoring fees required to be added back. In another ruling, it finds that a corporate officer who had no responsibility for financial reporting matters was not personally liable for unpaid use tax pursuant to Va. Code § 58.1-1813. The occasional sale exemption applies for a school that engages in sales of surplus items once per year (or every other year). In fact, as long as no more than three such sales occur each year, the sales are exempt. A manufacturer who leases a vending machine used to dispense exempt safety equipment used in the manufacturing process are subject to sales tax. The dispensing of exempt safety equipment is not an exempt activity, and the activity is not used directly in the manufacturing process.

 

State Regulations and Public Notices

The California Franchise Tax Board issues Cal. Admin. Code tit. 18, § 25128.5 that clarifies the single sales factor filing election now available to multistate taxpayers that must apportion their business income derived from sources in California. It applies to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. It issues a 15-day notice for comment for proposed § 25136 relating to sales of other than tangible personal property. It arguably broadens the scope, but is offered as an attempt to capture the original intent of the original regulation. It further defines the meaning of “mixed intangible,” looks to the location of the benefit of the service for approximating sales.

Indiana Department of Revenue revises Directive No. 5 as to the proper tax treatment for income paid to entertainers in the state. It classifies the treatment based on (i) employees of a promoter, (ii) independent contractors, and (iii) employees of a production company. It also revised Information Bulletin No. 88 regarding the tax treatment of non-resident professional athletes playing in Indiana. It revises Information Bulletin No. 39 to reflect the new single-factor sales apportionment for non-resident individuals. And Information Bulletin No. 11 for sales tax is revised to further lay out the proper taxation of purchases (and exemption for consumables), as well as clarifying when an exemption certificate for the purchase of food from a restaurant is proper.

Utah State Tax Commission issues rule effective October 1, 2011 regarding proper allocation of gross receipts attributable to Utah. If the corporation does not have an office in Utah from which the sales are negotiated or effected, then the receipts allocable to Utah are (i) those resulting from performance of services with greater benefit in Utah than any other state, and (ii) sale of goods for delivery in state regardless of title terms. Utah State Tax Commission has promulgated final rule 884-24P-033 that modifies guidance on the assessment of personal property tax for business property and motor vehicles.

Wisconsin Department of Revenue revised Tax Publication 207, which provide guidance for contractors as to the payment of sales tax. Notable changes are relating to equipment being provided by an operator, and conformity with Chula Vista case.

Ohio Department of Revenue has began a push to let the public know about a new use tax amnesty program that began in October. This is a key opportunity for businesses to come into compliance in connection with use tax in Ohio.

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance releases a summary of 2011 legislative changes to the sales tax.

 

State Legislative Affairs

California modifies existing law to require not only the reimbursement of sales tax paid by a manufacturer to replace a vehicle under the state’s “Lemon Law,” but to also reimburse any payment of use tax by the manufacturer. AB 1069 has extended the California film tax credit, an amount based on a percentage of expenditures for the production of a qualified motion picture in California, or, where the qualified motion picture has relocated to California or is an independent film, to July 1, 2015. AB 291 extended the additional $0.006 per gallon tax for storage of petroleum in underground tanks through January 1, 2014.

Tennessee’s governor announced an agreement with Amazon to bring in more jobs and $350 million in capital investment as Amazon agrees to begin collecting Tennessee sales tax effective January 1, 2014 unless a national “solution” first arises. The Legislature would have to approve the agreement, with a bill to be introduced in January.

Reps. Womack (R) and Speier (D) announced that they are cosponsoring Amazon legislation in the U.S. House. It would empower states to require online retailers to collect sales and use tax even if the retailer lacks a physical presence. The bill will be known as the Marketplace Equity Act.

 

Judicial and Administrative Decisions

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division affirms the decision of the Tax Court, published at 25 N.J. Tax 398 (Tax 2010), granting the Director,

Division of Taxation, summary judgment dismissing the Estate’s complaint with prejudice and denying an inheritance tax refund.  The court rules that the three-year limitation on requesting inheritance tax overpayment refunds, set by N.J.S.A. 54:35-10, is enforceable; and the Square Corners Doctrine does not apply to the facts of this case so as to preclude application of N.J.S.A. 54:35-10.

The Kentucky Court of Appeals, in Department of Revenue v. St. Joseph Health Sys., Inc., et al, reversed a decision in which the lower court found that a gas broker was not a utility, and thus not subject to the utility gross receipts tax. KRS 160.613(1). The hospital had argued as an exempt entity it was not subject to the tax. This was a matter of statutory interpretation by the court, and the court undertook the review to interpret the statute “liberally.” Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth Transportation Cabinet, 983 S.W.2d 488, 490 (Ky. 1998).  (Note: Texas narrowly construes tax statutes against the taxing authority – so quite possibly a different result in Texas.) Because the statute did not state the tax is imposed on a “public utility,” but instead it is imposed on “utility services,” it found that the gas broker was liable.

A three-member panel of the Vermont Supreme Court (not precedential) holds that a comparable provided by taxpayer to dispute assessed value sufficient to rebut presumption of validity of tax appraisal. The government appraiser must provide some evidence to support valuation.

The Washington Board of Tax Appeals rules that a prescription provider whose customers were enrollees of Washington’s Uniform Medical Plan did not qualify for the lower business and occupation tax rate for persons engaged in warehousing and reselling drugs for human use. The BDA focused on the definition requiring drugs to be resold to hospitals and health care providers. UMP is in the insurance business, and insurance companies are not included.

Illinois Department of Revenue Office of Administrative Hearings rules that food given away is subject to use tax.

Michigan Tax Tribunal rules that estimated audit was flawed because of auditor went to purchases to determine sales, as opposed to relying on Z tapes. Auditor’s judgment of inherent unreliability of Z tapes is not sufficient to disregard those records. Taxpayer’s documented close supervision of all sales, understanding of how to transact sales in conformance with tax code by the employees, as well as reconciliation of Z tapes to cash and credit card receipts. Internal controls are sufficient to ensure tax is property collected and reported. Michigan Tax Tribunal rules that former shareholder who sold interest in corporation and continued as president and employee was not a responsible corporate officer under MCL 205.27a(5).

New York Supreme Court rules in New York Mills Redevelopment Co. LLC, et al. v. Town of Whitestown et al. that a taxpayer must have actual notice of withdrawal of exemption, and that upon such date of actual notice the statute of limitations beings to run.

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court rules in Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co. v. Commw. that pallet used to transport and hold products constitutes exempt packaging for sales and use tax purposes. This is a tax opportunity across the various states.

Ford Motor Co. sues the Florida Department of Revenue to overturn a decision that mandates Ford to pay use tax on parts provided by Ford to complete warranty repairs by repair shops.

Washington Department of Revenue issues a decision regarding agents for growers, warehousing and separate business, and fruit bin rentals. A fruit packing house asserts that its fruit sorting and packing income is exempt from the service and other activities B&O tax, alleging that its income was compensation for the “receiving, washing, sorting, and packing” of fruit from a grower.  It also protests the warehousing B&O tax assessed on amounts derived from its storage of fruit claiming that this activity was not a separate business activity from its fruit sorting and packing business. Taxpayer also protests the deferred sales tax/use tax assessed on fruit bin rentals. While income from performing the fruit sorting and packing services would be exempt if performed for a grower, the customer was a packing house, so no exemption. As to the separate business issue, the DOR pointed to Yakima Fruit Growers Ass’n v. Henneford, 187 Wash. 252, 60 P.2d 62 (1936), which analyzed the separate business issue as to growers, and rejected the taxpayer’s argument. Regarding the argument that sales and use tax did not apply, the DOR pointed to a lack of documentation to prove up that sales tax had already been paid, or to show that the bins belonged to the customers and rejected the claim. In another released decision, the Washington Department of Revenue rules that a grocery store does not qualify for the lower B&O rate slaughter houses due to processing of meat products in the store delis. Finally, it lays out in another ruling the proper tax treatment for certain amusement and recreation sales, and how that fits into the resale exemption for purchased items necessary to provide those services, all in the context of the B&O tax. It is a detailed ruling, and instructive for bifurcating sales of TPP from services, and how the resale exemption fits into that box.

 

Other Documents

It was a flyer for a New York school hockey team that gave the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance the motivation to enact the controversial Amazon law based on affiliate contact. Robert Plattner, Commissioner, stated that an employee of the Department received a flyer from his son’s hockey team, and the flyer touted that the hockey team would receive 6 percent of all sales purchased through Amazon. That appeared to be more like a commission, the active solicitation of sales in New York by Amazon, and along the lines of Scripto as opposed to Quill. The rest is history. Thanks to Amy Hamilton for her report.

Weekly SALT News Update

October 11, 2011

State DOR Letters and Administrative Rulings

The Tennessee Department of Revenue rules that software configuration services are not subject to sales tax. The industrial equipment exemption does not apply as to sales tax in connection with the sale of compressed air with compressors on site. The assembly of leased equipment is subject to sales tax as services necessary to complete a sale.

In a shift, the Indiana Department of Revenue issues a statement that it will no longer impose sales tax on digital goods unless specific circumstances exist, citing the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement.

The Louisiana Department of Revenue issues guidance on the new exemption from sales tax for breastfeeding equipment.

The Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission upholds a retaliatory insurance tax against a Kansas insurance company.
The Montana Revenue Tax Appeal Board rules on property tax assessments based on comparables, and lays out how not to fight a property tax dispute.

New Jersey issues guidance on the sales tax treatment of manufacturer and seller coupons. It states that the coupons should be treated “like cash” since the seller gets the coupon value from the manufacturer. Thus sales tax is charged on the face value of the coupon. However, coupons issued by sellers are treated as discounts, and not as cash. Sales tax is imposed on the discounted value of the sale. Note that the sales tax treatment for coupons varies from state to state. For example, the Texas Comptroller seems to treat Groupon discounts as cash , while other coupons are reductions in price for sales tax. See also New York’s policy here.

The Kansas Department of Revenue clarifies that layaway charges are not subject to sales tax.

 

State Regulations and Public Notices

Arkansas and Kentucky revise their taxability matrix for the streamlined sales and use tax agreement.

The California Franchise Tax Board lays out the state franchise tax treatment of series LLCs. While California law does not provide for series limited liability companies, it does accommodate them for tax purposes.

The Mississippi Attorney General opines that property manufactured in Mississippi does not qualify for the free port warehouse exemption as it goes beyond the purpose of the exemption and does not comply with a strict reading of the statute.

 

State Legislative Affairs

None noted.


Judicial and Administrative Decisions

New York Tax Appeals Tribunal rules that a taxpayer must consolidate its returns. Presumption for consolidation when wholly owned and combined group engages in unitary business. Ernst & Young LLP was engaged to provide multistate tax planning ideas and strategies. No business purpose as transactions entered into had no potential for profit and unnecessary for credit and collection functions. E&Y report showing met Section 482 principles irrelevant as no proof that transaction “merits tax respect.”

The 9th Circuit rules in Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation that a state requirement imposed by Washington for tribal members to collect sales tax does not violate the U.S. treaty with the tribe. The requirement imparts a minimal interference into the business of the tribe, and is constitutional.

The United States Supreme Court denied petition to both the KFC and the Lamtec cases. The two cases used an expansive interpretation of nexus to that has been hotly contested. The Court, without comment, declined the opportunity to clarify Quill.

The Maryland Court of Appeals in Timothy A. Frey, et al v. Comptroller holds that the nonresident tax on in-state income is constitutional. It is a compensatory tax, and should be upheld pursuant to Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality,511 U.S. 93 (1994).

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Kurbatov v. Department of Labor elevated its decision to a published ruling, laying out the line on whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor.

 

Other Documents

Rutgers issues a study showing New Jersey lost up to $171 million in sales and use tax as a result of uncaptured Internet sales.

The Texas Taxpayers and Research Association sides with the Texas Comptroller and the Attorney General in the Allcat case, opining that the Texas franchise tax cannot be viewed as a net income tax, but is a tax on an entity not the natural partner. TTARA also pointed to the U.S. Bureau of the Census as declaring the Texas franchise tax to be a fee for doing business, and not a net income tax. The Texas Attorney General filed its brief on the merits. A detailed analysis is here.

Weekly SALT News Update

October 3, 2011

State DOR Letters and Administrative Rulings

The Indiana Department of Revenue provided guidance on what constitutes tangible personal property. That guidance includes the specific view that electricity is tangible personal property. It also discusses the taxation of intangibles in the state. It also ruled that medical devices are not exempt if there is not a prescription. So a sale of a medical device to a doctor or a hospital is not exempt as a device being prescribed. It may qualify for the sale for resale exemption, as the doctor resells the device to a patient, but the requirements to claim a sale for resale exemption must be followed.

The Connecticut Department of Revenue offered guidance on new sales tax changes for the sale of vehicles and extended warranties as a result of 2011 legislation. New taxable services include motor vehicle towing and road services, and motor vehicle storage services.

The Maine Department of Revenue revised guidance regarding warranty agreements, service contracts, and maintenance agreements.

Tennessee’s Department of Revenue ruled that an out-of state provider of telecommunication services is not subject to sales tax, but that the services are taxed where the services are actually performed. In another ruling, it found that a person who delivers rented tangible personal property to provide services must charges sales tax on those delivery charges. And over the counter sales of fuel are not exempt from sales tax, strictly construing the exemption for sales of fuel for residential use against the taxpayer. Last, software configuration services are not subject to sales tax.

 

State Regulations and Public Notices

Prior to the publication of Indiana Commissioner’s Directive #41, Indiana Department of Revenue imposed sales and use tax on products transferred electronically based on whether the products were taxable in their tangible forms. Citing compliance with the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement, the Department will impose sales and use tax on products transferred electronically only if the products meet the definition of specified digital products, prewritten computer software, or telecommunication services.

 

State Legislative Affairs

The bill in Michigan to institute a New York style Amazon tax has been introduced and numbered.

California adds olive trees to those items taxed at the 1% gross sales tax rate for deciduous pome and stone fruit trees, nut trees, and grapevines.

Massachusetts Senate pushed forward S.2015 that would authorize casinos and one slot parlors in the state. It levies a 25 percent gross gaming revenue tax, and a 40 percent daily tax on gross gaming revenue from a single slot parlor.

The National Conference of State Legislatures met in San Antonio, and reportedly ended with the Multistate Tax Commission (“MTC”) and Chainbridge Software, LLC playing defense. The MTC came under attack for not being quite up front and public in the decision making process, while Chainbridge was attacked for using unreliable data to calculate potential audit candidates for government authorities.

 

Judicial and Administrative Decisions

Texas Third Court of Appeals hears oral argument of DTWC Corp. v. Combs. The case involves a potential expansion of the sale for resale exemption to include any transfer of tangible personal property in connection with services, regardless of whether the services have been subject to sales tax. Also, potentially it loosens the requirement of consideration to be paid with a sale for resale. Oral argument appeared to go better for the taxpayer, the appellant, than the Texas Attorney General.

In Ivory Homes, Ltd. v. Utah State Tax Comm’n, No. 20090679, (Utah 2011), the Utah Supreme Court ruled against the taxpayer’s argument that charges for shipping that were not separately stated should be excluded from the imposition of sales tax. Utah does not impose sales tax on shipping charges so long as they are separately stated. Because there was no written evidence of an intent by the parties to separately charge sales tax, and the amount charged was presented as one amount (including shipping), sales tax was appropriate on the entire amount.

New York Tax Appeals Tribunal required a company to file a consolidated return with wholly-owned subsidiaries as taxpayer failed to rebut the presumption of distortion under 20 NYCRR 6-2-3.

The Ninth Circuit, in Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation v. Gregoire, Dkt. No. 10-35776 (9th Cir. Sept. 23, 2011), ruled in favor of the State of Washington, finding that the requirement for retailers of an Indian tribe to collect tax was not a tax imposed on the tribe, but a pass through tax. Further, collection of the tax is a minimal burden imposed on the tribe and permitted pursuant to Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134 (1980).

 

Other News

Good article regarding the current status of the Amazon legislation across the country, including Amazon’s current “play nice” strategy with California.

Study by Rutgers University for the New Jersey Retail Merchants Association shows New Jersey lost between $52 million and $171 million due to non-payment by New Jersey residents of sales use taxes on Internet purchases.

Weekly SALT News Update

September 28, 2011

State DOR Letters and Administrative Rulings

The Wisconsin Appeals Commission ruled services are not presumed to be subject to sales tax. In looking to whether barge fleeting services are “taxable services,” the plain language of the statutes does not impose the sales tax and thus the state cannot interpret into the taxation of services those services that are not clearly included. Same rule follows inTexas.

Illinoispublished a ruling on the applicability of the manufacturing exemption in connection with a meat processing facility, and what parts of the plant equipment would qualify for the sales tax exemption.

The Missouri State Tax Commission set aside an assessor’s appraisal for property tax in favor of the income approach used by taxpayer as the taxpayer’s report was substantial and persuasive, recognizing actual economic conditions affecting the subject property.

The Missouri Department of Revenue ruled on the application of sales tax for cabinet manufacturing, finding that the transactions by a cabinet manufacturer would be exempt where title to the cabinets transferred to the customers passed after installation. It also ruled that devices used merely to improve appearance, but not required for medical purposes, is not exempt from sales tax as a medical device. Also, an online ticket broker with no nexus to Missouri is not required to collect sales tax Missouri for tickets sold to Missouri customers or for events in Missouri. It ruled on the concept of integrated manufacturing, and looked to prior decisions that greatly expanded the term such as the “manufacture” of telephone calls. Finally, information services are not subject to sales tax.

New Yorkoffered guidance in dealing with sales tax on transactions in which a person purchases a coupon for a reduced price for goods or services via the Internet. Think Groupon. It also offered guidance for sales tax liability of members of limited liability companies and partners of limited liability partnerships.

 

State Regulations and Public Notices

Rhode Islandhas published the final version of its regulations on the sales taxation of computer programs  There are no significant changes to the final version from that originally proposed.

The North Carolina Department of Revenue advised on “major” sales tax changes by the state legislature for both persons who are registered before the department and other taxpayers.

 

State Legislative Affairs

Michigan State Representatives Kowall and Ananich introduced HB 5004 that would introduce a New York-style Amazon law to require Internet retailers to collect use tax inMichigan.

There is a rumor circulating in the Beltway that the Main Street Fairness Act may be combined with other legislation in an effort to secure GOP support. The Main Street Fairness Act would use federal legislation to allow states to require persons selling taxable items but who are currently beyond the reach of the states to actually collect relevant state use taxes. Currently the bill lacks significant support (including any GOP legislators).

California law, in connection with its unclaimed property statutes, has extended “no apparent commercial value” property to be held for seven years, which is an increase from the prior rule that a holder must retain such property for 18 months.


Judicial and Administrative Decisions

In a case of first impression, the Colorado Court of Appeals has ruled that electricity is tangible personal property, and thus machinery used in the generation of electricity qualifies for the manufacturing exemption from sales and use tax. Other states have also treated electricity as tangible personal property, including Texas (Tex. Tax Code § 151.317) and Indiana.

The New Jersey Superior Court ruled against a taxpayer on an appeal of a property tax dispute. In the instant case, the taxpayer, who was without legal counsel, ignored previous court rulings requesting filings and appropriate responses. The court recognized the taxpayer’s apparent indifference to court orders and ruled against the taxpayer on the second run through the appellate court system, having already given the taxpayer a chance once before to amend his responses.

In the PRA Government Services case, in which anAlabamacourt is asked to rule on the legality of a class action against contingent fee  auditors for a state agency, the taxpayers have amended the complaint to add hundreds of local jurisdictions as defendants. This could be a key case dealing with class actions and the proper use of contingent fee auditors by state agencies.

The Alaska Superior Court ruled that the property tax exemption granted to married couples is discriminatory as applied to same-sex couples.

 

Other Documents

The handout used at the last Houston Bar Association tax luncheon is provided, which outlines the latestTexas legislative updates to the Tax Code, and recent judicial updates involving theTexas franchise tax, including the current constitutional challenge to the revisedTexas franchise tax at the Texas Supreme Court.

Weekly SALT News Update

August 29, 2011

Texas Supreme Court Rules “Pole Tax” Does Not Violate First Amendment

In a unanimous decision Texas Supreme Court rules stripper “pole tax” does not violate First Amendment. The decision reverses a 2-1 Third Court of Appeals decision, which had held the tax violated the First Amendment in upholding the trial court’s ruling. The decision remands the case to the trial court, where three arguments remain, all based on challenges to the tax under the Texas Constitution.

New Jersey Appeals Court Upholds Tax Court Finding No Unitary Nature of Limited Partnership

New Jersey Appellate Division holds limited partner of limited partnership was not subject to Corporation Business Tax because limited partner was not unitary with limited partnership and limited partner had no independent nexus with NJ. The decision upholds the lower court’s decision. The decision is discussed in greater detail at this blog post.

Missouri Denies Sale for Resale Exemption for Guest Houses

Worlds of Fun  (“WOF”) operated cabins and cottages that it rented to guests on a nightly basis. It claimed a sale for resale exemption on tangible personal property that it provided to the guests in the quarters, such as benches, beds and mattresses. The Administrative Hearing Commission denied the exemption on the basis that insufficient control was transferred to the guests. A similar case regarding toiletries is currently pending before the Texas Third Court of Appeals, for which the trial court denied the sale for resale exemption.

California Governor Asks Legislature for Mandatory Single-Factor Formula

The California governor asks the Legislature for a mandatory single-factor formula for state income tax based on sales in California. The hope is that such a change would incentivize business to maintain corporate headquarters in the state.

Pennsylvania Reissues Ruling on Computer “Help” Services

The Pennsylvania Department of Revenue has reissued SUT-6-014, which clarified those “help” services that are subject to sales tax. Where the taxpayer’s employees are not under the control of the customer, the services rendered are not taxable as a “help supply” service.  61 Pa. Code § 60.4.

Arizona Appeals Rules No Need to Exhaust Administrative Remedies

The Arizona Court of Appeals reversed a lower court decision, and ruled that a direct appeal to the tax court is permitted in connection with a tangible personal property valuation.

New Mexico Accepts CPA’s Negligence to Waive Penalty

A taxpayer who had not filed for the New Mexico gross receipts tax was granted a waiver from the payment of penalty based on the representation that such non-filing was the result of advice provided by a CPA.

Allcat Replies to Texas Attorney General in Challenge to Texas Franchise Tax

Allcat has filed its reply to the Texas Attorney General in connection with its challenge that the Texas Franchise Tax (also known as the “margin tax”) is unconstitutional. Allcat argued that limited discovery was appropriate at the Supreme Court level, that the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act does apply, and requested more time to brief the case.

New York Rules Estimated Audit Proper with Partial Records

The New York Division of Tax Appeals has ruled that due to only partial records being provided in a protracted audit of a taxpayer, that it was appropriate to estimate the sales tax due.

Texas Supreme Court Requests Briefing of Sale for Resale Case 

The Texas Supreme Court has requested briefing in connection with a claim for the sale for resale exemption for prizes sold in “claw” machines.

New York Rules Not Able to Estimate Tax Refund

The New York Division of Tax Appeals has ruled that a taxpayer cannot use estimate to calculate refund or credit amount for sales and use tax.

Indiana Tax Court Rules for Miller Brewing on Apportionment

Miller Brewing avoids income tax on Indiana sales if third party picks up at plant. Court says irrelevant that tax avoided in all states as a result of decision.

Georgia Considers Tax Court

A Georgia legislative subcommittee considered the creation of a tax court on August 24, 2011.

Texas Third Court of Appeals Hears Argument on Sale-for-Resale Exemption for Toys Used in Coin-op Machines–Possible Impact on Upcoming Hotel Line of Cases

December 23, 2010

By Paul Masters

On December 15, 2010, the Texas Third Court of Appeals heard oral argument on an appeal by Roark Amusement & Vending, L.P. in response to a lower court’s decision upholding the Texas Comptroller’s action imposing sales and use tax on the purchase by Roark for toys placed in a claw machine. Roark argued the sales and use tax sale-for-resale exemption applied as the toys in the claw machine were used in the performance of a taxable service. It argued that coin-operated amusement services should be subject “to the integral transfer sales and use tax exemption found in the ‘sale for resale’ tax exemption statute.” Roark alternatively argued that 34 Tex. Admin. Code § 3.301(b) is invalid to the extent it excludes Roark’s transaction from the sale-for-resale exemption, as the Comptroller improperly limited the Legislature’s exemption.

(more…)