Tennessee Court of Appeals Holds Out-of-State Book Distributor, Scholastic, Subject to Sales and Use Taxes Because of Substantial Nexus Through Local Schools and Teachers; Creates Split in Courts

  by Stewart Weintraub and Jennifer Weidler

The Tennessee Court of Appeals held that an out-of-state book distributor, Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc. (“Scholastic”), was obligated to collect Tennessee sales and use taxes because the distributor had substantial nexus with the state.

The court found the substantial nexus to be present through the local schools and teachers who participated in Scholastic’s program, holding that those teachers acted as agents for the company.  It found that Scholastic utilized teachers to effectuate its sales, creating a de facto marketing and distribution mechanism, and therefore Scholastic had nexus with the state.

Scholastic is a Missouri-based company that sells books and other materials to schoolchildren through the use of catalogs.   Scholastic mails catalogs to teachers, who are under no obligation to pass out the catalogs to students, to order any merchandise or to obtain orders from students.  If a teacher or student decides to order something, the teacher enters the order for the student or students on a form and submits it to Scholastic with payment.  The books are then delivered to the teacher, who distributes them to the students who ordered them.

The issue of whether school teachers create in-state nexus for Scholastic was litigated in the courts of five (5) other states.  The decision by the Tennessee Court of Appeals now establishes three (3) states holdingthat the school teachers created nexus for Scholastic and three (3) states findingthat the school teachers did not create nexus for Scholastic.  Courts in both Kansas and California joined with the Tennessee Court of Appeals’ holding and courts in Arkansas, Michigan and Connecticut refused to find nexus.

Those courts siding with the Tennessee Court of Appeals similarly reasoned that the teachers acted with respect to Scholastic’s products and were acting under Scholastic’s authority.  Moreover, they found that the teachers acted as a conduit for Scholastic to the students, thereby establishing substantial nexus. See, Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc. v. State Bd. Of Equalization, 255 Cal. Rptr. 77 (Cal. App. 1989); In re: Appeal of Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc., 920 P.2d 947 (Kan. 1996).

Conversely, the courts that found a lack of requisite nexus drastically differed.  For instance, one court found that, “[t]he teachers are not a sales force that works for plaintiff.  Rather, they are analogous to parents who order an item from a mail-order catalog for their children; no one would seriously argue that such parents are a ‘sales force’ for mail-order vendors.” Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc. v. Department of Treasury, 567 N.W.2d 692, 696 (Mich. App. 1997).  Additionally, a Connecticut court held that, “[t]here is no question that [Scholastic] and the participating teachers have a satisfying symbiotic relationship.  But to conclude that these relationships, drawn from school classrooms, amount to the teachers being ‘representatives,’ carries the matter constitutionally too far.” Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue Services, 2009 WL 1175675 (Conn. Super. 2009); see also, Pledger v. Troll Book Clubs, Inc., 871 S.W.2d 389 (Ark. 1994).

Thus, for now the issue remains split between the states, with the latest case in Tennessee finding substantial nexus through what the court viewed as the use of teachers to effectuate Scholastic’s sales, thereby creating a de facto marketing and distribution mechanism.

Explore posts in the same categories: Sales and Use Tax, Tennessee

Tags: ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

3 Comments on “Tennessee Court of Appeals Holds Out-of-State Book Distributor, Scholastic, Subject to Sales and Use Taxes Because of Substantial Nexus Through Local Schools and Teachers; Creates Split in Courts”


  1. […] The Tennessee House approved legislation, HB 2370, which would implement an agreement between the Tennessee Governor and Amazon.com regarding the collection of sales taxes in the state.  The legislation would grant Amazon.com an exemption from the collection of state sales tax through the sooner of January 1, 2014, or upon the passage of a federal law addressing the issue of remote sales.  For prior coverage of the legislation, click here. […]


  2. […] The Connecticut Supreme Court reversed a lower court’s decision and held that Scholastic Book Clubs, Inc. was subject to state sales tax because in-state school teachers acted as its representatives, thereby creating the requisite nexus to justify imposing the tax.  For prior coverage of this issue, click here. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: