Pennsylvania Considering Legislation that Would Amend Corporate Tax and Abolish Delaware Holding Company Loophole

  by Stewart Weintraub and Jennifer Weidler

Pennsylvania is now attempting to join the list of states which have challenged the use of the so-called Delaware Loophole.  In the past, other states have challenged the Delaware Loophole by litigation or by legislation.  The legislative remedies involved enacting either combined reporting or disallowing the deduction for the royalty payments.  OnWednesday January 25th, House Bill 2150, Printer’s No. 3019 (“Bill 2150”), was introduced into the Pennsylvania Legislature.  If enacted,Bill 2150 would amend the Pennsylvania Corporate Net Income Tax and address, among other thing, theso-called Delaware Loophole by disallowing the deduction that the parent operating corporation claims for the royalty payments made to its Delaware Holding Company (“DHC”).

More specifically, Bill 2150 would add-back certain intercompany expenses paid to a DHC.  Effective for tax year 2013, the legislation would disallow deductions for, “an intangible expense or cost paid, accrued or incurred in connection with one or more transactions with an affiliated entity.”  However, there are two (2) exceptions pursuant to which the deduction will be allowed.  The first is where the transaction in question was directly related to a valid business purpose.  A valid business purpose is defined as, “[a] purpose, other than the avoidance or reduction of taxation, which alone or in combination with other purposes constitute the primary motivation for a business activity or transaction which changes in a meaningful way, apart from a reduction of taxation, the economic position of the taxpayer.”  Furthermore, an arm’s length transaction is presumed to be directly related to a valid business purpose.  The second instance forwhich the deduction will be allowed is where a taxpayer is engaged in one or more transactions with an affiliated entity subject to tax in Pennsylvania or another state where the tax is determined upon a base that includes the intangible expense as income.  In such instances,the taxpayer shall receive a credit against tax due in an amount equal to the tax paid by the affiliated entity with regard to the portion of its income that represents the parent’s/affiliate’s intangible expense.

Apart from the Bill 2150’s attempt at closing the Delaware Loophole, it also proposes certain corporate tax reductions.  First, Bill2150 gradually reduces the corporate net income tax rate from 9.99% to 6.99% during a six-year period.

Tax Year Corporate Net Income Tax Rate
2013 9.99%
2014 9.49%
2015 8.99%
2016 8.49%
2017 7.99%
2018 7.49%
2019 6.99%

As illustrated above, beginning with tax year 2014, the corporate net income tax rate would be gradually reduced, ultimately reaching its 6.99% low for tax year 2019.

Bill 2150 also phases out the net operating loss tax deduction cap.  The cap is increased during nine years, commencing in 2014.

Tax Year Cap on Credit for Net Operating Loss
2013 Greater of 20% of taxable income or $3,000,000
2014 Greater of 29% of taxable income or $4,000,000
2015 Greater of 38% of taxable income or $5,000,000
2016 Greater of 47% of taxable income or $6,000,000
2017 Greater of 56% of taxable income or $7,000,000
2018 Greater of 64% of taxable income or $8,000,000
2019 Greater of 73% of taxable income or $9,000,000
2020 Greater of 82% of taxable income or $10,000,000
2021 Greater of 91% of taxable income of $11,000,000
2022 No cap.

As illustrated above, beginning with tax year 2014, the cap will be increased annually.  This will culminate in an uncapped amount for tax years 2022 forward.

Finally, for tax years 2013 forward, Bill 2150 changes the business income apportionment factors for Corporate Net Income Tax purposes from 90% sales, 5% property and 5% payroll to 100% sales.  However, for the apportionment of capital stock value – for Capital Stock Tax and Foreign Franchise Tax purposes – the apportionment factors remain the standard equally weighted three-factor (property, payroll and sales factor) apportionment method.

Explore posts in the same categories: Corporate Tax, Delaware, Pennsylvania, SALT Update

Tags: , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

3 Comments on “Pennsylvania Considering Legislation that Would Amend Corporate Tax and Abolish Delaware Holding Company Loophole”

  1. Opus the Poet Says:

    So, in exchange for not siphoning all in-state income to a DHC, corporate taxes will be cut by 30%? I thought Corporations were People, why not tax them the same as people (sole proprietorship)?


  2. […] that have challenged the use of the so-called Delaware Loophole, according to our colleagues at the State and Local Tax Blawg.  The legislation, contained in Pa. House Bill 2150, would disallow deductions that a parent […]


  3. […] that suggested a close to the “Delaware loophole.” For previous coverage of that bill, please click here.  Competing legislation is currently being drafted that will seek to create a broader add-back […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: